 |
|
Releases & Statements
I fully support the people’s
hearing on Two Columbus Circle. While the New York City Landmarks
Preservation Commission has ducked its responsibility to hold
a public hearing, concerned New Yorkers have taken action. They
should be commended and the issues they raise should be taken
into consideration as the Commission proceeds with this important
decision.
The Commission should not, however,
be let off the hook so easily. A public hearing before the Commission
itself is still the most meaningful forum in which to discuss
the status of the building, air all relevant information, and
allow the people to express their will. The argument for such
a hearing is persuasive. Numerous experts and residents consider
Two Columbus Circle a compelling candidate for preservation. Others
disagree. Clearly, the conclusions of both sides are debatable,
but if the Commission won’t permit a debate, there is no
way to know whether Two Columbus Circle deserves landmark status
or not.
By reversing course and holding a
public hearing, the Commission can preserve the independence on
which the integrity of its rulings depends. By shedding the light
of day on this process, it can show that the opinions of experts
were given due consideration and the concerns of residents were
taken seriously. In the meantime, the Commission can begin to
restore the good will it has jeopardized by listening to the testimony
at today’s people’s hearing and responding quickly,
publicly, and candidly.
|
|
