Public Advocate Banner
Home About Press Policy Contact
About the Office
Betsy Gotbaum
Contact
News
Press Releases
Policy
Reports
Reports
Reports
Get Help
How We Can Help
Commission on School Governance
Public Advocate's Blog
 
 
 

Releases & Statements

Testimony of Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum for
Rent Guidelines Board Public Hearing
on Proposed Rent Increases for Rent-Regulated Buildings

Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to testify.

I am here today because affordable housing is one of the most important issues facing this city. Hard-working families are already paying more for everything from a gallon of milk to a gallon of gas. Incomes are not keeping up with inflation. We cannot control these factors on the local level, but we can control the cost of housing.

The fact is countless New Yorkers are being priced out of their homes. According to the latest available data, more than a quarter of tenant households devote more than 50% of their income to rent. For low-income tenants living in rent-regulated apartments, the news is far worse: nearly 75% pay at least half their income in rent.

In my judgment, this is a crisis. With each passing year, working New Yorkers get stuck deeper in the mud: their income remains static while their rent rises, leaving them with no opportunity to get ahead. If this trend continues New York will become what the cynics say it already is—an exclusive club for the idle rich.

The only way to stop this downward spiral is to make the well-being of tenants at least as high a priority as the profit margins of landlords. We have somehow gotten to a point where a substantial rent increase every year is considered a matter of course. It’s time to remind ourselves that, while tenants are struggling to keep their heads above water, landlords are profiting. The extent to which they are profiting certainly varies from year to year, but no landlord will have to cut back on groceries or prescription drugs if rents do not go up. On the other hand, thousands of tenants will face just such hardships if the proposed increases are approved.

Take, for example, the case of George in the Bronx. George is a Russian immigrant supporting a wife, daughter, and mother-in-law. His daughter is starting college at Columbia in the fall. His wife, having just graduated from college, has $45,000 in loans to pay off. George is legally blind and unable to work as a result of an injury suffered three years ago. He receives $680 a month from social security, but his rent is nearly $900 a month. At times, his apartment has no heat, but no one ever comes to fix the problem.


Families like George’s are doing everything they can to improve their situations and contribute to the economic life of this city. But for every step they take up the ladder of success, we add another rung.

Seniors on fixed incomes are also hit hard by rent hikes because they can’t keep up as their expenses increase. I just came from Washington Heights, where an elderly gentleman told me that his 73-year-old wife is still working so that they can make ends meet. When retirement starts to seem like an unrealistic ambition, the cost of housing has gotten out of control.

I am not insensitive to the concerns of landlords. I know that operating costs have risen as a result of 2003’s steep property tax hike and the ever-escalating cost of fuel. But landlords have been compensated with dramatic rent increases the past two years. They continue to benefit from remarkably advantageous mortgage rates, and there is reason to believe that operating costs are stabilizing. The conditions will never be better for prioritizing affordability. The time to freeze rents is now.

In addition, I urge the Board to once again vote down the most regressive measures proposed by landlords: the
so-called “longevity tax,” which punishes tenants, especially senior citizens, for maintaining a stable home; the “low-rent” surcharge, which is a barely disguised poor tax; and the three-percentage-point spread between one- and two-year leases, which, like the “longevity tax,” amounts to an additional rent increase on long-term tenants.

In a city where home ownership is an unattainable dream for so many, these proposals just rub salt in tenants’ wounds. We should be encouraging families to stay in one place, helping them create a nest egg, not penalizing them for their aspirations.

This is a critical moment in New York City’s history. It is a truism that if you can make it here you can make it anywhere. But if it becomes impossible for working families to make it here, New York will lose its status as a world-class city where people of all backgrounds come together. The Rent Guidelines Board must do its part to keep the dream alive. It has responsibility not just to landlords, but to all New Yorkers, present and future.

Thank you.


 

Back to top