Public Advocate Banner
Home About Press Policy Contact
About the Office
Betsy Gotbaum
Contact
News
Press Releases
Policy
Reports
Reports
Reports
Get Help
How We Can Help
Commission on School Governance
Public Advocate's Blog
 
 
 

Releases & Statements


Contact: Frank Sobrino, Press Secretary
O: (212) 669-4193


Gotbaum: City’s Adult Protective Services Is a Disaster Waiting to Happen

The City’s Adult Protective Services unit often fails to provide adequate care to many of its mentally and physically impaired clients, according to a report released today by Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum.

“APS is responsible for protecting vulnerable New Yorkers who cannot take care of themselves,” Gotbaum said. “Yet my report is full of examples of APS failing to act promptly in serious cases. APS is an overlooked agency and a disaster waiting to happen. Problems will persist as long as APS continues failing to provide enough training and support to help overburdened workers do their jobs effectively.”

The Public Advocate’s examination of APS found that:

APS does not respond to clients in a timely manner, leaving them without vital services.

APS workers are hampered by increasingly high caseloads – as high as 81 cases for a single worker – well above the recommended 25 cases per worker, and overloaded with paperwork, leaving little time to care for each of their clients.

APS workers do not consider themselves adequately trained before entering the field.

Workers lack the support they need from senior administration in order to fulfill their job duties efficiently.

APS’ heavy-duty cleaning policy, which requires workers to supervise while the contracted cleaning agency completes its work in clients’ apartments, prevents workers from spending vital time in the field.

APS does not work effectively with community-based organizations that have long-standing relationships with clients to provide those clients with the best possible care.
A division of the City’s Human Resources Administration, APS is a state-mandated program charged with assisting individuals over the age of 18, who, because of mental or physical impairment, cannot care for themselves. In order to be eligible for APS, individuals must be

incapable of managing their own resources, carrying out activities associated with daily living, or protecting themselves from abuse, neglect, or exploitation without assistance from others. APS provides an array of services, including assistance in obtaining benefits, financial management, heavy-duty cleaning services, and referral for psychiatric and medical examination.

The Office of the Public Advocate interviewed 30 staff members from community-based organizations in all five boroughs about their experiences interacting with APS on behalf of individuals they serve. The Office also interviewed 29 APS staff members about agency operations.

The interviews uncovered a number of serious cases in which APS’ policies and inaction had damaging results.

In one instance, an alert bank manager worked with a local CBO after a 65-year-old client, accompanied by a young man, began withdrawing up to $40,000 from her account on several occasions. The CBO discovered that APS had already investigated the case on charges that the younger man was financially exploiting and verbally abusing the elderly woman. However, by the time APS reopened the case – a full seven months after a second referral to the agency – the younger man had reportedly taken more than $130,000 of the elderly woman’s money.

In another case, a judge ordered APS to provide a bedridden 50-year-old man with 24-hour home care because he could not take care of himself. His room is small, cluttered, and he regularly soils himself. At present, the client receives home care only once a month. Home care agencies refused to take his case because of his drug addiction and APS proved to be his last resort. His APS worker has begun the bureaucratic process of applying for guardianship so that the client will receive 24-hour care, but is overburdened with over 60 cases and a high volume of paperwork. As a result, the worker does not have time to visit this client daily.

A social worker from a CBO contacted APS for help concerning a 95-year-old woman living alone and suffering from dementia. APS visited the woman twice to assess the situation, but did not take steps to provide her with home care services on a regular basis. After several weeks of calling APS to follow up on home care for the woman, the CBO social worker finally learned that the case had been closed. The woman later set her apartment on fire while trying to dry clothing using a heater and was hospitalized and placed in a nursing home. The worker reported that the woman would have been fully capable of living independently if she had been given proper assistance in a timely manner.

According to an APS worker, referring to one eviction case in which an overextended worker could not adequately represent a mentally ill elderly man: “We give clients a false hope that we’ll protect them when we can’t.”

Gotbaum makes the following recommendations in her report:

APS should decrease the number of cases per worker by hiring additional staff.

APS should divide the home care department into two specialized units, one which provides services to the mentally ill and another which provides services to the elderly.

APS should increase the number of training days for prospective workers and incorporate a greater number of the core competency requirements recommended by the National Association of Adult Protective Services Administrators (NAAPSA).

Training for APS workers should, at minimum, be comparable in duration and content to worker training provided in other states.

APS should provide equipment, such as cell phones and laptop computers, to its workers so that they are able to work more effectively.

APS should enact policies to allow workers to spend more time with clients. APS should change its policy to require APS workers to spend three days in the field, rather, than two, allowing workers additional time to visit clients.

APS should require stronger relationships and open communication with CBOs which can help APS workers gain an understanding of the client before an APS worker conducts an in-home visit, and can help the worker obtain access to new clients’ homes.
“These stories clearly demonstrate the need for improved policies and practices at APS,” Gotbaum said. “My office has heard from far too many advocates struggling to provide proper care for their clients while trying to cut through APS’ red tape. The City has got to step in now to protect these clients and implement reforms that will benefit future clients as well.”

“There is a growing number of elderly New Yorkers living in desperate situations needing assistance from a system that is broken,” said Bobbie Sackman, director of public policy for the Council of Senior Centers and Services. “This cries out for immediate attention by the city and the public. Steps need to be taken to bring sufficient resources to APS to both quickly help seniors in need now and systemically to ensure older New Yorkers can depend upon the City when they are in need. The report clearly demonstrates that lives hang in the balance.”

* * *


Unprotected: Adult Protective Services Struggles to Serve Vulnerable Clients (PDF)

 


Back to top